Denys O.H. v. Vilma A.G.

108 A.D.3d 711, 968 N.Y.S.2d 887

This text of 108 A.D.3d 711 (Denys O.H. v. Vilma A.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denys O.H. v. Vilma A.G., 108 A.D.3d 711, 968 N.Y.S.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for the appointment of the petitioner, Denys O.H., as the guardian of Luis A.G., a person under 21 years of age, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Aaron, J.), dated August 7, 2012, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is [712]*712remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings, including a new determination of the petition.

Luis A.G. was born in El Salvador in 1995. In March 2012, he entered this country illegally, and was apprehended by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. He was subsequently released to the care of his maternal uncle, Denys O.H. In May 2012, Denys O.H. commenced the instant proceeding, seeking to be appointed Luis’s guardian. The Family Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

When considering guardianship appointments, the infant’s best interests are paramount (see SCPA 1707 [1]; Matter of Stuart, 280 NY 245, 250 [1939]; Matter of Melissa B. v Dean S., 89 AD3d 1018, 1019 [2011]; Matter of Alexander N., 5 AD3d 776 [2004]; Matter of Amrhein v Signorelli, 153 AD2d 28, 31 [1989]). The order appealed from, however, is devoid of any references to Luis’s best interests. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings, including a new determination of the petition. Mastro, J.P., Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Stuart
20 N.E.2d 741 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Melissa B. v. Dean S.
89 A.D.3d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Amrhein v. Signorelli
153 A.D.2d 28 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A.D.3d 711, 968 N.Y.S.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denys-oh-v-vilma-ag-nyappdiv-2013.