Home/Supreme Court of Colorado/Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. Glodt

Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. Glodt

67 Colo. 115
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1919
DocketNo. 9311
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 67 Colo. 115 (Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. Glodt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denver Union Terminal Railway Co. v. Glodt, 67 Colo. 115 (Colo. 1919).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen:

This is an action brought by John J. Glodt and Albert Glodt, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, against The Denver Union Terminal Railway Company, as defendant, to recover damages for the depreciation of the rental and market value of plaintiffs’ property, caused by the closing [116]*116and vacation of parts of certain streets in the City and County of Denver, and the building of a viaduct approach.

The property of the plaintiffs, alleged to have been damaged, is described as lots 13 and 14, in block 5, of Hoyt & Robertson Addition to the City of Denver. This block lies between, and is bounded on the easterly and westerly sides respectively by Division Street and Nineteenth Street. Division Street, as it runs in a southerly direction, terminates at the southeast corner of the block in question, and just before so ending intersects or crosses Twentieth. Street diagonally. The block is bounded on its southerly side by Delgany Street. The plaintiffs’ lots are located practically in the southeast comer of the block; they are each 125 feet deep and 25 feet wide, having a frontage of 50 feet on Delgany Street. There is no alley in the rear of the lots, and prior to the time of the injury complained of, the plaintiffs’ property had two approaches and exits with reference to the business section of the city — one west on Delgany Street to Nineteenth Street, and the other east on Delgany Street to Twentieth Street. The business section of the city lies south of the plaintiffs’ property and of Delgany Street.

The location of the plaintiffs’ property with reference to the streets herein mentioned, and, in general, the facts hereinafter noted, will more clearly appear by reference to the following plat:

[117]*117

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LeSatz v. Deshotels
757 P.2d 1090 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1988)
State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. Davis
626 P.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1981)
Hayutin v. Colorado State Department of Highways
485 P.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1971)
Thornton v. City of Colorado Springs
478 P.2d 665 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1970)
Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
476 P.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1970)
Troiano v. Colorado Department of Highways
463 P.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1969)
Roth v. Wilkie
354 P.2d 510 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Bennett v. Nations
164 P.2d 1019 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1945)
Grand River Dam Authority v. Misenhimer
1945 OK 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1945)
City of Colorado Springs v. Weiher
129 P.2d 988 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1942)
Mandell v. Board of Com'rs of Bernalillo County
99 P.2d 108 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Colo. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denver-union-terminal-railway-co-v-glodt-colo-1919.