Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States

391 U.S. 919, 88 S. Ct. 1805, 20 L. Ed. 2d 656, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1684
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 20, 1968
DocketNo. 1259
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 391 U.S. 919 (Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. United States, 391 U.S. 919, 88 S. Ct. 1805, 20 L. Ed. 2d 656, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1684 (1968).

Opinion

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

At & T Corporation v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
283 F.3d 1156 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Kaczowski
114 F. Supp. 2d 143 (W.D. New York, 1999)
United States v. Willie Taw Newsome
898 F.2d 119 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. James v. McDonough
835 F.2d 1103 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
King v. Bergland
517 F. Supp. 1363 (D. Colorado, 1981)
Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa
600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
Glover Construction Company v. Andrus
591 F.2d 554 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Glover Construction Co. v. Andrus
591 F.2d 554 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Interstate Commerce Commission v. All-American, Inc.
505 F.2d 1360 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
Tenneco Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission
442 F.2d 489 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Hooper
320 F. Supp. 511 (E.D. Tennessee, 1970)
United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad
308 F. Supp. 293 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 U.S. 919, 88 S. Ct. 1805, 20 L. Ed. 2d 656, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denver-rio-grande-western-railroad-v-united-states-scotus-1968.