Denty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Denty v. State

731 So. 2d 789, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005, 1999 WL 225945

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 1999

DocketNo. 98-4654

StatusPublished

This text of 731 So. 2d 789 (Denty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denty v. State, 731 So. 2d 789, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005, 1999 WL 225945 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.800. We treat the motion as if it were filed in compliance with rule 3.850 and affirm.

In his motion, appellant sought an additional 73 days’ jail credit. He alleged that he had been held continuously from March 24, 1997, until sentencing on September 5, 1997, for a total of 166 days, but only' received credit for 93. days. The trial court denied the motion, finding that appellant had spent 93 days in jail prior to sentencing, and in support of this finding, it attached the Columbia County Detention Center Jail Credit Certificate. Because the record conclusively refutes appellant’s allegations, the order denying the motion for additional jail credit is affirmed. In so saying, we note no apparent error or miscalculation in the jail credit certificate as was present in the cases cited in the dissent.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ„ CONCUR. BENTON, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure 3.800. We treat the motion as if it were filed in compliance with rule 3.850 and affirm.

In his motion, appellant sought an additional 73 days’ jail credit. He alleged that he had been held continuously from March 24, 1997, until sentencing on September 5, 1997, for a total of 166 days, but only' received credit for 93. days. The trial court denied the motion, finding that appellant had spent 93 days in jail prior to sentencing, and in support of this finding, it attached the Columbia County Detention Center Jail Credit Certificate. Because the record conclusively refutes appellant’s allegations, the order denying the motion for additional jail credit is affirmed. In so saying, we note no apparent error or miscalculation in the jail credit certificate as was present in the cases cited in the dissent.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ„ CONCUR. BENTON, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

731 So. 2d 789, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5005, 1999 WL 225945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denty-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack