Dentorium Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dentorium Products Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 330, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3687

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 17, 1963

DocketNo. 67823; protests 62/4002 and 62/18089 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 330 (Dentorium Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dentorium Products Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 330, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3687 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of artificial teeth similar in all material respects to those the subject of Air Express Int’l Agency, Inc., et al. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 163, C.D. 2251), the claim at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1558, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52827), for nonenumerated manufactured articles was sustained. Other items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of shade guides the same in all material respects as those the subject of Swissedent International and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 174, C.D. 2298), were held entitled to free under the provision in paragraph 1821(a) and (b), as added by Public Law 85-211 (T.D. 54463), for samples to be used in the United States only for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries, so treated that they are unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as samples, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of artificial teeth similar in all material respects to those the subject of Air Express Int’l Agency, Inc., et al. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 163, C.D. 2251), the claim at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1558, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52827), for nonenumerated manufactured articles was sustained. Other items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of shade guides the same in all material respects as those the subject of Swissedent International and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 174, C.D. 2298), were held entitled to free under the provision in paragraph 1821(a) and (b), as added by Public Law 85-211 (T.D. 54463), for samples to be used in the United States only for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries, so treated that they are unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as samples, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cust. Ct. 330, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dentorium-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack