Denton v. Ward

37 S.E. 729, 112 Ga. 532, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 232
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 729 (Denton v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denton v. Ward, 37 S.E. 729, 112 Ga. 532, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. The ground of the motion for a new trial alleging error in admitting evidence does not disclose what the same was, and is, for this and other obvious reasons, plainly without merit.

2. It does not appear, either from the face of the plaintiff’s petition or otherwise, that his cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

3. There was no evidence to support the defense of plene administravit, and there was sufficient evidence to warrant the finding in the plaintiff’s favor.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crozier v. Goldman
111 S.E. 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 729, 112 Ga. 532, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denton-v-ward-ga-1900.