Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC
This text of Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC (Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
AMY DENTON and TODD DENTON PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:22-cv-1092-DPM
THRASHER POOL AND SPA LLC DEFENDANT/ CROSS-DEFENDANT
Vv.
SHOTCRETE LLC CROSS-CLAIMANT
ORDER Amy and Todd Denton properly served Thrasher Pool and Spa on 26 April 2023. Doc. 19. The Clerk entered a default, Doc. 33, after Thrasher failed to answer or respond. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Amy Denton submitted two affidavits establishing that the Dentons’ damages were $361,285.64, of which they recovered $140,000 from Shotcrete and Aqua Pro. There’s no need for a hearing. Cutcliff v. Reuter, 791 F.3d 875, 882 (8th Cir. 2015). The Dentons are entitled to the difference — $221,285.64 —from Thrasher, plus post-judgment interest. 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)-(b). The Dentons’ motion for default judgment, Doc. 55 & 59, is granted. Shotcrete’s crossclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Doc. 58.
So Ordered. WPranstall __ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Mle fre. 2025
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denton-v-thrasher-pool-and-spa-llc-ared-2025.