Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided June 16, 2025·No. 4:22-cv-01092·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

AMY DENTON and TODD DENTON PLAINTIFFS

No. 4:22-cv-1092-DPM

THRASHER POOL AND SPA LLC DEFENDANT/ CROSS-DEFENDANT

Vv.

SHOTCRETE LLC CROSS-CLAIMANT

ORDER Amy and Todd Denton properly served Thrasher Pool and Spa on 26 April 2023. Doc. 19. The Clerk entered a default, Doc. 33, after Thrasher failed to answer or respond. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Amy Denton submitted two affidavits establishing that the Dentons’ damages were $361,285.64, of which they recovered $140,000 from Shotcrete and Aqua Pro. There’s no need for a hearing. Cutcliff v. Reuter, 791 F.3d 875, 882 (8th Cir. 2015). The Dentons are entitled to the difference — $221,285.64 —from Thrasher, plus post-judgment interest. 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)-(b). The Dentons’ motion for default judgment, Doc. 55 & 59, is granted. Shotcrete’s crossclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Doc. 58.

So Ordered. WPranstall __ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Mle fre. 2025

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC, (E.D. Ark. 2025).

Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC (Denton v. Thrasher Pool and Spa LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tana Cutcliff v. Kathleen Reuter
791 F.3d 875 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)