Denton v. Ipock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Denton v. Ipock

635 S.W.2d 79, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2939

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1982

DocketNo. 12753

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 635 S.W.2d 79 (Denton v. Ipock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denton v. Ipock, 635 S.W.2d 79, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2939 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a five-count petition against defendants, seeking: (1) declaratory judgment she was the owner of certain real estate; (2) reformation of a deed to the property; (3) that title to the tract be quieted in her by reason of adverse possession; (4) an injunction against defendants trespassing on the land in question; (5) and, damages from the defendants for their unlawful possession of the parcel of real estate.

Trial was to the court and judgment entered finding plaintiff was the owner of the described real estate by reason of adverse possession. The remaining counts were not dismissed and the court’s judgment makes no attempt to dispose of the same. Accordingly, this appeal is premature and is dismissed. City of New Madrid v. Associated Electric Cooperative, 582 S.W.2d 727 (Mo.App.1979).

MAUS, C. J., and FLANIGAN and PREWITT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a five-count petition against defendants, seeking: (1) declaratory judgment she was the owner of certain real estate; (2) reformation of a deed to the property; (3) that title to the tract be quieted in her by reason of adverse possession; (4) an injunction against defendants trespassing on the land in question; (5) and, damages from the defendants for their unlawful possession of the parcel of real estate.

Trial was to the court and judgment entered finding plaintiff was the owner of the described real estate by reason of adverse possession. The remaining counts were not dismissed and the court’s judgment makes no attempt to dispose of the same. Accordingly, this appeal is premature and is dismissed. City of New Madrid v. Associated Electric Cooperative, 582 S.W.2d 727 (Mo.App.1979).

MAUS, C. J., and FLANIGAN and PREWITT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

635 S.W.2d 79, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 2939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denton-v-ipock-moctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack