Denton v. Denton

1 Johns. Ch. 364, 1815 N.Y. LEXIS 201, 1815 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4
New York Court of Chancery·Decided February 23, 1815·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The bill filed in this cause states matter properly cognizable in equity. It is as well for alimony as for other relief. The allowance of a ne exeat, when the husband threatens to leave the state, and his wife without any support, is essential to justice, and has been granted in like cases. (2 Atk. 210. Amb. 76. Dickens, 154.) From what was said in the case of Mix v. Mix,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denton v. Denton, 1 Johns. Ch. 364, 1815 N.Y. LEXIS 201, 1815 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. 1815).

1 Johns. Ch. 364 (Denton v. Denton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wandell v. Wandell
189 A. 44 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1937)
In re Grbic
174 N.W. 546 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1919)
Robinson v. Robinson
41 A. 1009 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1898)
Harding v. Harding
21 L.R.A. 310 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Lishey v. Lishey
2 Tenn. Ch. R. 1 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1873)
Ford v. Ford
10 Abb. Pr. 74 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1871)
Leslie v. Leslie
6 Abb. Pr. 193 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)