Denton v. Daniels
77 P. 1129, 69 Kan. 850, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 351
This text of 77 P. 1129 (Denton v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Denton v. Daniels, 77 P. 1129, 69 Kan. 850, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 351 (kan 1904).
Opinion
In this case the surety was shown to be liable, whether the revivor proceedings were good or bad. The petition was not open to the charge of duplicity merely because it disclosed all the facts. The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of McCormick v. Fisher, 63 Kan. 199, 65 Pac. 223.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Fisher
65 P. 223 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 P. 1129, 69 Kan. 850, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denton-v-daniels-kan-1904.