Dental Leasing Corp. v. Antonoff

63 A.D.2d 618, 405 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11466

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 30, 1977, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements, and without prejudice to an application by defendant-appellant to reopen plaintiff-respondent’s examination before trial in order to pursue before Special Term, Part II, rulings on objections previously interposed on plaintiff’s examination. Appellant has failed to follow the procedure set forth in Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v Sinclair ReBning Co. (26 AD2d 285, app dsmd 26 AD2d 544). The attempt to circumvent that procedure by appellant’s application for penalties under CPLR 3124 does not make the order thereon appealable. (Klein v Schneiderman, 58 AD2d 763.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Birns, Evans and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dental Leasing Corp. v. Antonoff, 63 A.D.2d 618, 405 N.Y.S.2d 407, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

63 A.D.2d 618 (Dental Leasing Corp. v. Antonoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v. Sinclair Refining Co.
26 A.D.2d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Tri-State Pipe Lines Corp. v. Sinclair Refining Co.
26 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Klein v. Schneiderman
58 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)