Dent v. State
228 S.E.2d 357, 139 Ga. App. 321, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1784
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of theft by taking. On appeal he enumerates only that the court erred in denying his motion for continuance. Motions for continuance are within the discretionary ambit of the trial judge and, absent a clear showing of abuse, this court will not reverse for refusing to grant a continuance. Keller v. State, 128 Ga. App. 129, 131 (195 SE2d 767). No abuse of discretion has been shown.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dent v. State, 228 S.E.2d 357, 139 Ga. App. 321, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).
228 S.E.2d 357 (Dent v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buckler v. State
302 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Chester v. State
296 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Hammonds v. State
277 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Gaines v. State
235 S.E.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)