Dent v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dent v. State

768 So. 2d 529, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2257

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 2000

DocketNo. 1D00-844

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 768 So. 2d 529 (Dent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dent v. State, 768 So. 2d 529, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2257 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we affirm the denial of relief as to the first claim raised in the motion, but reverse the denial of relief as to the second claim. In reversing the denial of relief as to the second claim, we accept the state’s confession of error based on Lewis v. State, 751 So.2d 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), and remand to the trial court either for attachment of those portions of the record conclusively refuting the second claim or for an evidentiary hearing on that claim.

BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we affirm the denial of relief as to the first claim raised in the motion, but reverse the denial of relief as to the second claim. In reversing the denial of relief as to the second claim, we accept the state’s confession of error based on Lewis v. State, 751 So.2d 715 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), and remand to the trial court either for attachment of those portions of the record conclusively refuting the second claim or for an evidentiary hearing on that claim.

BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 So. 2d 529, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12088, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dent-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack