Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.
116 A. 923, 97 N.J.L. 322, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 194
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Ceiaxoellor, Chief Justice, Trexchard, Bergex, Mixturx, Kalisch, Katzexbach, Williams, Gardxer, Ackersox, Yax Busktrk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Xone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 116 A. 923, 97 N.J.L. 322, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1922).
116 A. 923 (Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. Purepac Corp.
196 A.2d 695 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)