Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.

116 A. 923, 97 N.J.L. 322, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 194
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Ceiaxoellor, Chief Justice, Trexchard, Bergex, Mixturx, Kalisch, Katzexbach, Williams, Gardxer, Ackersox, Yax Busktrk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Xone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 116 A. 923, 97 N.J.L. 322, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1922).

116 A. 923 (Dent v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Purepac Corp.
196 A.2d 695 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)