Denson v. State

929 So. 2d 598, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6516, 2006 WL 1195849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2006
DocketNo. 3D06-560
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 598 (Denson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denson v. State, 929 So. 2d 598, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6516, 2006 WL 1195849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Samuel Denson appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct a scrivener’s error. We will treat the original petition as a motion to correct a sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Thomas v. State, 763 So.2d 316 n. 1 (Fla.2000)(“It is clear that the defendant or the State may seek to correct a scrivener’s error by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).”).

On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. RApp.P. 9.141(b)(2)(A) & (D). Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langford v. State
929 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 598, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6516, 2006 WL 1195849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denson-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.