Densmore v. Westall

280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 8, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 939 (Densmore v. Westall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Densmore v. Westall, 280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. It is conceded that notice of the party caucus, at which it is alleged that one William J. Murray was nominated, was not given as required by the provisions of section 146 of the Election Law. In our opinion, the provisions of that section with respect to notice are mandatory and may not be disregarded, and the purported nomination is consequently void. Holán, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitzpatrickv. Ciamarra
27 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Chevere v. Sunderland
303 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Freed v. Hill
176 A.D.2d 1065 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hermenet v. Wykle
64 Misc. 2d 57 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/densmore-v-westall-nyappdiv-1952.