Densmore v. Westall
This text of 280 A.D. 939 (Densmore v. Westall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. It is conceded that notice of the party caucus, at which it is alleged that one William J. Murray was nominated, was not given as required by the provisions of section 146 of the Election Law. In our opinion, the provisions of that section with respect to notice are mandatory and may not be disregarded, and the purported nomination is consequently void. Holán, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/densmore-v-westall-nyappdiv-1952.