Densmore v. Westall
280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 1952·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. It is conceded that notice of the party caucus, at which it is alleged that one William J. Murray was nominated, was not given as required by the provisions of section 146 of the Election Law. In our opinion, the provisions of that section with respect to notice are mandatory and may not be disregarded, and the purported nomination is consequently void. Holán, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Densmore v. Westall, 280 A.D. 939, 115 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
280 A.D. 939 (Densmore v. Westall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitzpatrickv. Ciamarra
27 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Chevere v. Sunderland
303 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Freed v. Hill
176 A.D.2d 1065 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hermenet v. Wykle
64 Misc. 2d 57 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)