Densmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Densmore v. State

372 So. 2d 524, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14982

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1979·No. No. 77-1872·Published

Opinion

MOORE, Judge.

We find sufficient evidence to affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. The trial court erred, however, in sentencing appellant to a term of imprisonment at “hard labor”, and that portion requiring the sentence to be served at “hard labor” is stricken. Egan v. State, 364 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1978). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, Judge.

We find sufficient evidence to affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. The trial court erred, however, in sentencing appellant to a term of imprisonment at “hard labor”, and that portion requiring the sentence to be served at “hard labor” is stricken. Egan v. State, 364 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1978). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Densmore v. State, 372 So. 2d 524, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14982 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

372 So. 2d 524 (Densmore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related