Densmore v. Densmore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Densmore v. Densmore

228 S.E.2d 803, 237 Ga. 395, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1243

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 7, 1976

Docket31139

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 S.E.2d 803 (Densmore v. Densmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Densmore v. Densmore, 228 S.E.2d 803, 237 Ga. 395, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1243 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is by the former wife from a divorce, permanent alimony, and property division judgment that was entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury. Although the appellant has enumerated six errors, her brief states that the two issues for decision are: (A) whether the jury verdict was contrary to the law and evidence in awarding the husband a divorce, and (B) even if the jury verdict awarding the husband a divorce was supported by the evidence, whether the failure of the jury to equitably divide the property was contrary to the principles of justice and equity.

We have reviewed the record and the transcript, and we find that the evidence adduced before the jury adequately supports the verdict of the jury on both of these issues.

We find no error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is by the former wife from a divorce, permanent alimony, and property division judgment that was entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury. Although the appellant has enumerated six errors, her brief states that the two issues for decision are: (A) whether the jury verdict was contrary to the law and evidence in awarding the husband a divorce, and (B) even if the jury verdict awarding the husband a divorce was supported by the evidence, whether the failure of the jury to equitably divide the property was contrary to the principles of justice and equity.

We have reviewed the record and the transcript, and we find that the evidence adduced before the jury adequately supports the verdict of the jury on both of these issues.

We find no error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.E.2d 803, 237 Ga. 395, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/densmore-v-densmore-ga-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack