Densmore v. Berry
This text of Densmore v. Berry (Densmore v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION
YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. RE-99-107 GAB —NoK - (0/30/2200 JAMES DENSMORE, BONALDL. Gie<~ cout LAW Lis Plaintiff 2 ‘NO 2 ayy v. JUDGEMENT
ROBERT C. BERRY,
Defendant
By complaint dated December 8, 1999, Mr. Densmore claimed that Mr. Berry both obstructed and damaged a right-of-way from Owls Nest Road to his property in Shapleigh, Maine. Mr. Berry was served with the complaint, in hand, by a Deputy Sheriff on December 15, 1999.' He failed to answer, and a default judgement was entered against him on July 28, 2000. A hearing on damages was held on October 30, 2000. Mr. Densmore appeared with counsel, Mr. Lenkowski; Mr. Berry appeared
without counsel.”
1 There was some suggestion that Mr. Berry was not served with the complaint. However, the return of service by an appropriate officer, here a long-standing member of the sheriff's department, is accorded a presumption of regularity. Foley v. Adams, 638 A.2d 718 (Me. 1994).
2 The case was set for hearing at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff, along with counsel and a witness were present and a hearing on damages went forward. Before the hearing began, Ms. Perry, a friend of the defendant, stated that Mr. Berry had not received adequate notice of the hearing and was at work. I offered to delay the hearing until later in the morning so she could call Mr. Berry and advise him of the hearing. At first, Ms. Perry indicated that it was unlikely Mr. Berry would be available. Later, she indicated a desire to call Mr. Berry. He arrived at 10:00 a.m. and the entire hearing was held again in his presence. The Default Judgement ordered Mr. Berry to cease any attempts to obstruct »D the right-of-way and determined his liability for damaging it. The hearing on October 30, 2000 was for determination of an award of compensatory damages. Following hearing, I find and conclude that approximately 800-feet of gravel roadway, along with several culverts, needs repair. Based on the testimony of Mr. Stewart, an experienced excavating contractor, I find and conclude that the cost of the road repairs will be $12,040. Thus, the entry will be as follows: On Mr. Densmore’s complaint for compensatory damages, judgement for Mr. Densmore in the sum of $12,040. along
with interest and costs.
The clerk may incorporate this order in the docket by reference.
Dated: October 30, 2000 G. Arthur Brennan Justice, Superior Court Plaintiff: DEFENDANT: ROBERT C. BERRY Joseph Lenkowski, Esq. Defaulted SCACCIA LENKOWSKI AND ARANSON Owl's Nest Road PO Box 929
Shapleigh Me 04076 Sanford Me 04073-0929
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Densmore v. Berry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/densmore-v-berry-mesuperct-2000.