Denslow v. Bush

29 N.Y.S. 705, 9 Misc. 337
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided July 2, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McADAM, J.

The special term judge made an order sustaining the demurrer interposed to the complaint, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. No interlocutory or final judgment has been entered. The appeal is from the order only, and such an appeal will not lie. Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514; Whitman v. Nichols, 16 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 329; Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & S. F. Co., 16 Hun, 484; Gamer v. Harmony Mills, 6 Abb. N. C. 212, 45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 148; Bell v. Sun Co., 1 N. Y. Law Bui. 29; Trust Co. v. Pratt, 25 Hun, 23,-—and similar cases. For these reasons, the appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denslow v. Bush, 29 N.Y.S. 705, 9 Misc. 337 (superctny 1894).

29 N.Y.S. 705 (Denslow v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ludwig v. Gove
14 Misc. 233 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1895)