DeNoto v. L. Woerner, Inc.
This text of 186 A.D.2d 999 (DeNoto v. L. Woerner, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant Unger’s motion for a severance. Unger has failed to demonstrate that a joint trial will prejudice a substantial right (see, Fay v Chii Chung Wang, 134 AD2d 563). The negligence actions stated against the individual defendants are straightforward and are linked by a common theory of negligence against defendant HCR (see, Harris v Manos, 181 AD2d 967). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Severance.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denoto-v-l-woerner-inc-nyappdiv-1992.