DeNoto v. L. Woerner, Inc.

186 A.D.2d 999

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant Unger’s motion for a severance. Unger has failed to demonstrate that a joint trial will prejudice a substantial right (see, Fay v Chii Chung Wang, 134 AD2d 563). The negligence actions stated against the individual defendants are straightforward and are linked by a common theory of negligence against defendant HCR (see, Harris v Manos, 181 AD2d 967). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Severance.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeNoto v. L. Woerner, Inc., 186 A.D.2d 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 999 (DeNoto v. L. Woerner, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fay v. Wang
134 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Harris v. Manos
181 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)