Denomie v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 2020·No. SCPW-20-0000390·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 03-JUN-2020 02:01 PM

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

TEKOA IKAIKA DENOMIE, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PC091001448)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Tekoa Ikaika Denomie’s

“Motion to Release Non-Violent Community Custody Prisoner From

Custody with Special Release Terms and Conditions Amid

Coronavirus COVID-19 BioTerrorism Pandemic,” which was filed as a

petition for writ of habeas corpus on May 27, 2020, and the

record, it appears that petitioner presents no special reason for

this court to invoke its jurisdiction and has alternative means

to seek relief. See Oili v. Chang, 54 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d

787, 788 (1976). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas

corpus without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 3, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denomie v. State, (haw 2020).

Denomie v. State (Denomie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oili v. Chang
557 P.2d 787 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1976)
In Re Honolulu Rapid Transit Company, Ltd.
507 P.2d 755 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1973)