Denoia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

843 So. 2d 285, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1361, 2003 WL 289417
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1099·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COPE, J.

John Denoia appeals an adverse summary judgment in his suit seeking uninsured motorist benefits. On the facts present here, we conclude that defendant-appellee Hartford Fire Insurance Company was not entitled to summary judgment.

[286] Plaintiff Denoia’s automobile is insured by defendant Hartford. While driving westbound on the multi-lane Gratigny Parkway, the plaintiff was involved in an accident.

As we interpret the plaintiffs deposition, the car in front of the plaintiff ran over a steel beam which was lying in the roadway. This propelled the beam up into the air, and it struck the plaintiffs front bumper. The plaintiff saw the beam coming for approximately one second and was unable to take evasive action. The trooper testified that the beam lodged in the undercarriage of plaintiffs car, making it impossible to steer. The plaintiffs vehicle struck the guardrail. The plaintiff was rendered unconscious and was hospitalized.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denoia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 843 So. 2d 285, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1361, 2003 WL 289417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

843 So. 2d 285 (Denoia v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile etc. v. Denise Lorraine Hanania
261 So. 3d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)