Denny & Co. v. Gunn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Denny & Co. v. Gunn

124 S.E. 824, 32 Ga. App. 770, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 651

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1924

Docket15668

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 824 (Denny & Co. v. Gunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denny & Co. v. Gunn, 124 S.E. 824, 32 Ga. App. 770, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 651 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. As far as they present any questions in such manner as requires a consideration by this court, there is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. In the brief of the plaintiff in error the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon; and the court committed no error when it overruled the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. As far as they present any questions in such manner as requires a consideration by this court, there is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. In the brief of the plaintiff in error the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon; and the court committed no error when it overruled the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 824, 32 Ga. App. 770, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denny-co-v-gunn-gactapp-1924.