Dennison v. Spears

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dennison v. Spears

738 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11015, 1999 WL 623469

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 18, 1999

DocketNo. 99-2027

StatusPublished

This text of 738 So. 2d 514 (Dennison v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dennison v. Spears, 738 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11015, 1999 WL 623469 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the respondent agrees, the order and sentence finding the defendant guilty of indirect criminal contempt are vacated. The cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So.2d 422 (Fla.1977); Baumgartner v. Joughin, 105 Fla. 335, 141 So. 185 (1932); and DeMauro v. State, 632 So.2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Habeas Corpus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As the respondent agrees, the order and sentence finding the defendant guilty of indirect criminal contempt are vacated. The cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So.2d 422 (Fla.1977); Baumgartner v. Joughin, 105 Fla. 335, 141 So. 185 (1932); and DeMauro v. State, 632 So.2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Habeas Corpus granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11015, 1999 WL 623469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennison-v-spears-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack