Dennison v. Larned

7 F. Cas. 479, 6 McLean 496

• Court: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan
• Decided: June 15, 1855
• Status: Published

Opinion

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

This suit is brought on a note given by Roloefson to de-, fendant, for the payment of fifteen hundred dollars at Lyell’s Bank, in Detroit. The note was not paid at maturity, and it was protested. It seems that the note was given for the accommodation of the defendant. The note was the property of Fields & Stephens, who left it at Lyell’s Bank for Collection; after protest it was returned to the holders. The note was then sold to plaintiff, with whom the firm of Fields & Stephens do a large business in New York. The defense is, that Fields & Stephens are still the owners of the note, and that it was handed over to the plaintiff to bring suit in this court It was proved by Stephens, that this firm, having large dealings with the plaintiff, in New York, the note was assigned to him, and charged to his account. This action being brought by the indorsee against the indorser, there can be no objection to the jurisdiction of this court. The indorsement by Fields & Stephens was made by the defendant in blank when the note was handed to the bank for collection, as an authority to the bank to receive the proceeds. The note having been returned to the owners, they filled up the blank indorsement, to the plaintiff. This they had a right to do; or if the note was sold to the plaintiff with a blank indorsement, the plaintiff, being the holder of the note, had a right to fill the blank indorsement at any time during the trial or before it It is proved that the defendant applied to Stephens to intercede with the plaintiff for indulgence in the payment.

The jury found for the plaintiff. Judgment