Dennis v. State

73 S.E. 35, 10 Ga. App. 219, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 731
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 1911
Docket3847
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 35 (Dennis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. State, 73 S.E. 35, 10 Ga. App. 219, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 731 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, J.

While, under a number of decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, it is error to exclude a witness from testifying because he has remained in the court-room after an order for the sequestration of witnesses has been granted, still it is equally, well settled that a ground of a motion for a new trial complaining of such an error must show that the error resulted in injury, which is generally to be shown by a statement of what the complaining party expected to prove by the witness. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
84 S.E. 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 35, 10 Ga. App. 219, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-state-gactapp-1911.