Dennis v. State
This text of 73 S.E. 35 (Dennis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While, under a number of decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, it is error to exclude a witness from testifying because he has remained in the court-room after an order for the sequestration of witnesses has been granted, still it is equally, well settled that a ground of a motion for a new trial complaining of such an error must show that the error resulted in injury, which is generally to be shown by a statement of what the complaining party expected to prove by the witness. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 35, 10 Ga. App. 219, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-state-gactapp-1911.