Dennis v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Dennis v. Smith

431 A.2d 350, 288 Pa. Super. 185, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2838

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 19, 1981

Docket650

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 431 A.2d 350 (Dennis v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dennis v. Smith, 431 A.2d 350, 288 Pa. Super. 185, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2838 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action in trespass, the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee against appellant. Appellant subsequently filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. The court below denied the motion. The present appeal was then taken.

No judgment on the verdict has ever been entered. In the absence of the entry of such judgment, this appeal is premature. See Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co., 283 Pa.Super. 562, 424 A.2d 952 (1981); Straw v. Sands, 426 Pa. 81, 231 A.2d 144 (1967).

We have repeatedly advised the profession that an order refusing a new trial is interlocutory and is unappealable. [Citation omitted.] The appeal should not be filed and may not be entertained until a final judgment is entered.

Slagter v. Mix, 441 Pa. 272, 273, 272 A.2d 885, 885-86 (1971) (footnote omitted.)

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI