Dennis v. Smith

431 A.2d 350, 288 Pa. Super. 185, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2838
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 19, 1981·No. 650·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action in trespass, the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee against appellant. Appellant subsequently filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. The court below denied the motion. The present appeal was then taken.

No judgment on the verdict has ever been entered. In the absence of the entry of such judgment, this appeal is premature. See Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co., 283 Pa.Super. 562, 424 A.2d 952 (1981); Straw v. Sands, 426 Pa. 81, 231 A.2d 144 (1967).

We have repeatedly advised the profession that an order refusing a new trial is interlocutory and is unappealable. [Citation omitted.] The appeal should not be filed and may not be entertained until a final judgment is entered.

Slagter v. Mix, 441 Pa. 272, 273, 272 A.2d 885, 885-86 (1971) (footnote omitted.)

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. Smith, 431 A.2d 350, 288 Pa. Super. 185, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2838 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).

431 A.2d 350 (Dennis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWhorter v. Greenwood Gaming
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Grimes, F. v. Polymer Dynamcis, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Campo v. St. Luke's Hospital
755 A.2d 20 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Nudelman v. Gilbride
647 A.2d 233 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Ruffing v. 84 Lumber Co.
600 A.2d 545 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Coren v. DiDomenico
435 A.2d 1252 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)