Dennis v. Smith
Opinion
In this action in trespass, the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee against appellant. Appellant subsequently filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. The court below denied the motion. The present appeal was then taken.
No judgment on the verdict has ever been entered. In the absence of the entry of such judgment, this appeal is premature. See Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co., 283 Pa.Super. 562, 424 A.2d 952 (1981); Straw v. Sands, 426 Pa. 81, 231 A.2d 144 (1967).
We have repeatedly advised the profession that an order refusing a new trial is interlocutory and is unappealable. [Citation omitted.] The appeal should not be filed and may not be entertained until a final judgment is entered.
Slagter v. Mix, 441 Pa. 272, 273, 272 A.2d 885, 885-86 (1971) (footnote omitted.)
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
431 A.2d 350 (Dennis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.