Dennis v. Scarborough

372 So. 2d 357
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 20, 1979·No. Civ. 1814·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from jury verdict and judgment for defendant in an action for damages arising from an automobile accident.

The issue presented is that the verdict and judgment thereon are contrary to the great preponderance of the evidence.

It continues to be the law that only error asserted and ruled upon by the trial court may be asserted on appeal. Rule 4 (a)(3), ARAP. The issue of the weight of the evidence when there is a jury verdict can be raised only by a post-judgment motion. Plaintiff filed no such motion. There is no ruling of the trial court available for presentation on appeal. Woods v.Westbrook, 356 So.2d 153 (Ala. 1978); Porter v. Alabama FarmBureau, 279 Ala. 499, 187 So.2d 254 (1966).

The judgment below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. Scarborough, 372 So. 2d 357 (Ala. Ct. App. 1979).

372 So. 2d 357 (Dennis v. Scarborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouler v. Pugh
591 So. 2d 868 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Page v. Page
562 So. 2d 272 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Chestnut v. Laramore
560 So. 2d 1070 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Holmes v. State
485 So. 2d 381 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Rountree v. Sanders
413 So. 2d 1159 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Liberty Loan Corp. of Gadsden v. McCaskey
404 So. 2d 73 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Parker v. Parker
392 So. 2d 229 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1980)