Dennis v. Robinson

61 So. 597, 104 Miss. 548
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 So. 597 (Dennis v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. Robinson, 61 So. 597, 104 Miss. 548 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Eeed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of replevin to recover certain personal property included in a deed of trust given to secure a note upon which there was a balance due. Upon the trial, plaintiff introduced the deed of trust and note; but he wholly failed to prove in any way that the property levied on was that described in the deed of trust. He did not identify the property as that to which he had a right to recover under the lien of the deed of trust.

It is necessary in an action of replevin to show that the property levied on and taken in possession by the officer executing the writ was that which the plaintiff was entitled to recover in the suit brought. The trial court did not err in rendering the judgment for defendant because of the absence of the necessary proof to so identify the property.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
608 So. 2d 1205 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
Evans v. Junius Hart Piano House
106 So. 9 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 So. 597, 104 Miss. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-robinson-miss-1913.