Dennis v. Rainey

143 S.E. 911, 38 Ga. App. 250, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 167
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1928·No. 18887·Published

Opinion

Bkoxles, O. J.

Under the pleadings and the agreed statement of facts the plaintiS in the trial court was entitled to recover interest on the note sued upon, and the contrary holding of the court was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. E. B. Lambert, for plaintiff,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4396, 4400; 85 Ga. 142.

Meriwether F. Adams, for defendant,

cited: 74 Ga. 583 (3); 9 Ga. 133 (3); 21 Ga. 504 (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. Rainey, 143 S.E. 911, 38 Ga. App. 250, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

143 S.E. 911 (Dennis v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Hambrick
9 Ga. 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1850)
Martin v. Wright
21 Ga. 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1857)
Phillips v. O'Neal
11 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)