Dennis v. Rainey

143 S.E. 911, 38 Ga. App. 250, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 167
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1928
Docket18887
StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 911 (Dennis v. Rainey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. Rainey, 143 S.E. 911, 38 Ga. App. 250, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Bkoxles, O. J.

Under the pleadings and the agreed statement of facts the plaintiS in the trial court was entitled to recover interest on the note sued upon, and the contrary holding of the court was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. E. B. Lambert, for plaintiff,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4396, 4400; 85 Ga. 142.

Meriwether F. Adams, for defendant,

cited: 74 Ga. 583 (3); 9 Ga. 133 (3); 21 Ga. 504 (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. Hambrick
9 Ga. 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1850)
Martin v. Wright
21 Ga. 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1857)
Phillips v. O'Neal
11 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 911, 38 Ga. App. 250, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-rainey-gactapp-1928.