Dennis v. Morfi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dennis v. Morfi

766 So. 2d 340, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7579, 2000 WL 783983

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 21, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-1471

StatusPublished

This text of 766 So. 2d 340 (Dennis v. Morfi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dennis v. Morfi, 766 So. 2d 340, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7579, 2000 WL 783983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because there was conflicting evidence as to whether the alleged damages were caused by the car accident, we must affirm the jury’s verdict awarding no damages to the plaintiff and the denial of the plaintiffs motion for new trial. See Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967)(“[A] zero verdict in Florida may be sustained only where there is conflicting evidence as to whether the plaintiff was in fact injured, or that his injury proximately resulted from the defendant’s negligence.”); Westbrook v. All Points, Inc., 384 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Morin v. Halpern, 139 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). The remaining issues that were raised by the appellant lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because there was conflicting evidence as to whether the alleged damages were caused by the car accident, we must affirm the jury’s verdict awarding no damages to the plaintiff and the denial of the plaintiffs motion for new trial. See Parker v. Wideman, 380 F.2d 433, 437 (5th Cir.1967)(“[A] zero verdict in Florida may be sustained only where there is conflicting evidence as to whether the plaintiff was in fact injured, or that his injury proximately resulted from the defendant’s negligence.”); Westbrook v. All Points, Inc., 384 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Morin v. Halpern, 139 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). The remaining issues that were raised by the appellant lack merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 So. 2d 340, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7579, 2000 WL 783983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-morfi-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack