Dennis v. Howell

139 S.E. 347, 164 Ga. 657, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 246
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1927
DocketNo. 5720
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 347 (Dennis v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. Howell, 139 S.E. 347, 164 Ga. 657, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 246 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The judge properly struck the name of the City of Atlanta as a party to the case.

2. One of the issues in the case was whether Walnut Street had been dedicated and accepted by the City of Atlanta; and on that issue the resolution of the city council of 1916 was admissible as tending to show a recognition by the city of the existence of the street, and the court erred in rejecting it.

3. Other specific assignments, where a question is raised for determination by this court, show no reversible error.

4. As a new trial is granted in the case, no opinion is expressed as to whether the evidence authorized the verdict.

Appeal and Error, 4 O. J. p. 649, n. 36.

Municipal Corporations, 28 Cyc. p. 844,’ n. 17; p. 865, n. 42.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. B. L. Milling, E. W. Chambers, and Chambers & Dickey, for plaintiff. A. B. Dorsey, J. L. Mayson, and C. 8. Winn, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 347, 164 Ga. 657, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-howell-ga-1927.