Dennis v. Dennis

140 A.2d 180, 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 298
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1958·No. 2108·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband sued for an absolute divorce on the ground of five years’ voluntary separation. The wife answered denying the material allegations of the complaint, alleged desertion on his part, and in a cross-complaint prayed for temporary maintenance for the support of herself and the minor children who were in her custody. At the hearing on the wife’s motion for temporary maintenance it was disclosed that the husband was already under an order of the Juvenile Court to pay *181 $80 a month for the support of the wife and children. The trial court for that reason denied the motion. The wife appeals.

It is fundamental that the granting or refusing of temporary alimony or maintenance rests in the discretion of the trial court and is not to be disturbed by an appellate court except for a clear abuse. 1 We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

1

. Bates v. Bates, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 141 F.2d 723; Lachowicz v. Lachowicz, 60 App.D.C. 373, 55 F.2d 535.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. Dennis, 140 A.2d 180, 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 298 (D.C. 1958).

140 A.2d 180 (Dennis v. Dennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowie v. Nicholson
705 A.2d 290 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
Kreuz v. Kreuz
354 A.2d 867 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)
Campbell v. Campbell
353 A.2d 276 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)
Lewis v. Lewis
206 A.2d 266 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1965)