Dennis v. Communication Machinery Corp.

Third Circuit

Dennis v. Communication Machinery Corp.

135 F.3d 764, 1997 WL 809556

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1997

Docket96-5843

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 F.3d 764 (Dennis v. Communication Machinery Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dennis v. Communication Machinery Corp., 135 F.3d 764, 1997 WL 809556 (3d Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

135 F.3d 764

Evetta Dennis, Thomas Dennis, Patricia Williams, Darlene
Smith, Ruth Ann Cast, Estella Vick
v.
Communication Machinery Corporation, a/k/a CMC and/or CMC
Rockwell, as Successor to and/or d/b/a Communication
Machinery Research Corporation, CMC Acquisition Corp.,
Unisys Corporation, Pertec Computer Corporation, Scan
Optics, Inc., Sperry Rand Corporation; Unisys Corporation,
Pertec Computer Corporation v. Pertec Computer Corporation, Pertec

NO. 96-5843

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Dec 10, 1997

Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.905073 ,

Fisher, J.,

927 F.Supp. 156

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI