Dennis v. Colley

37 S.E. 119, 112 Ga. 114, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 57
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 30, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

A judgment rendered by default in a suit upon a promissory note may, even after an execution has been issued upon the same and property sold thereunder, be amended so as to make it conform to the pleadings in the case wherein such judgment was rendered. Alexander v. Troutman, 1 Ga. 469; Irby v. Brown, 59 Ga. 596; Dixon v. Mason, 68 Ga. 478, See also Williams v. Merritt, 109 Ga. 217.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis v. Colley, 37 S.E. 119, 112 Ga. 114, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 119 (Dennis v. Colley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turley v. Turley
262 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
King v. Rodgers
95 S.E. 766 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Elliott v. Wilks
85 S.E. 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Scarborough v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
62 S.E. 1040 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)