Dennis v. Colley

37 S.E. 119, 112 Ga. 114, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 57
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 30, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 119 (Dennis v. Colley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. Colley, 37 S.E. 119, 112 Ga. 114, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 57 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

A judgment rendered by default in a suit upon a promissory note may, even after an execution has been issued upon the same and property sold thereunder, be amended so as to make it conform to the pleadings in the case wherein such judgment was rendered. Alexander v. Troutman, 1 Ga. 469; Irby v. Brown, 59 Ga. 596; Dixon v. Mason, 68 Ga. 478, See also Williams v. Merritt, 109 Ga. 217.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turley v. Turley
262 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
King v. Rodgers
95 S.E. 766 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Elliott v. Wilks
85 S.E. 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Scarborough v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
62 S.E. 1040 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 119, 112 Ga. 114, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-colley-ga-1900.