Dennis v. City of Palmetto

202 S.E.2d 717, 130 Ga. App. 242, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1291
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1973
Docket48495
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 S.E.2d 717 (Dennis v. City of Palmetto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. City of Palmetto, 202 S.E.2d 717, 130 Ga. App. 242, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1291 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff sued the city for damages to his property caused by the erection of a water tank located near his property. The plaintiff admits that prior to the institution of this suit he did not give the defendant the ante litem notice required by Code Ann. § 69-308. However, he contends that his bringing a prior suit for a permanent injunction against the city to prevent the construction of the water tower constitutes substantial compliance with the Code and serves as the ante litem notice for this case. In this connection see Dennis v. City of Palmetto, 226 Ga. 853 (178 SE2d 161). Held:

The ante litem notice is required as a condition precedent to a suit against a municipality to recover for injuries to personal property. City of Atlanta v. Frank, 120 Ga. App. 273 (170 SE2d 265). The object of the ante litem notice is to enable the municipality to investigate the claim and determine whether the claim should be adjusted without suit or to contest its validity in the courts. Kennedy v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 8 Ga. App. 98 (68 SE 652). The prior action for permanent injunction could not operate to serve as compliance with the statute. This case is a suit for damages. The prior equitable proceeding for injunctive relief could not serve as a pre-litigation notice to the municipality that a claim for money damages was being asserted against it. Accordingly, the failure to comply with the statute requiring the ante litem notice is a fatal defect. The trial court properly dismissed the complaint on this ground.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, J., concurs. Deen, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDaniel v. Anderson
274 S.E.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 S.E.2d 717, 130 Ga. App. 242, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-city-of-palmetto-gactapp-1973.