Dennis T. Hutto v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2017·No. 16-4377·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DENNIS T. HUTTO, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-4377

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 16, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Robert M. Foster, Judge.

Dennis T. Hutto, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In response to this court’s show cause order, the state conceded that the trial

court first failed to issue an order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), prior to barring appellant from filing any pro se filings without the signature

of a member of The Florida Bar. We therefore reverse and remand the order on

appeal because the lower court must first comply with Spencer before prohibiting

pro se filings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dennis T. Hutto v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Dennis T. Hutto v. State of Florida (Dennis T. Hutto v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)