Dennis Surratt v. United States
This text of 210 F.2d 731 (Dennis Surratt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
93 U.S.App.D.C. 415
Dennis SURRATT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 11860.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Feb. 17, 1954.
Decided Feb. 25, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
[93 U.S.App.D.C. 416] Mr. Dominic A. St. Angelo, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Anthony J. Brosco was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance for appellee.
Before EDGERTON and FAHY, Circuit Judges, and RICHMOND B. KEECH, District Judge sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant complains of the admission of certain evidence and the use that was made of it. We find no prejudicial error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 F.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-surratt-v-united-states-cadc-1954.