Dennis Surratt v. United States

210 F.2d 731
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 1954
Docket11860
StatusPublished

This text of 210 F.2d 731 (Dennis Surratt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis Surratt v. United States, 210 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

210 F.2d 731

93 U.S.App.D.C. 415

Dennis SURRATT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11860.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 17, 1954.
Decided Feb. 25, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

[93 U.S.App.D.C. 416] Mr. Dominic A. St. Angelo, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Anthony J. Brosco was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON and FAHY, Circuit Judges, and RICHMOND B. KEECH, District Judge sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the admission of certain evidence and the use that was made of it. We find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Surratt v. United States
210 F.2d 731 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 F.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-surratt-v-united-states-cadc-1954.