Dennis Ray Kidd v. Robert O'Neill Mike Lomonaco Fairfax County Police Department

804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33366, 1986 WL 18009
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1986
Docket86-6599
StatusUnpublished

This text of 804 F.2d 1250 (Dennis Ray Kidd v. Robert O'Neill Mike Lomonaco Fairfax County Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis Ray Kidd v. Robert O'Neill Mike Lomonaco Fairfax County Police Department, 804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33366, 1986 WL 18009 (4th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

804 F.2d 1250
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis Ray KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert O'NEILL; Mike Lomonaco; Fairfax County Police
Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6599.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 24, 1986.
Decided Nov. 10, 1986.

Before PHILLIPS, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

Dennis Ray Kidd, appellant pro se.

Edward Everett Rose, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Ray Kidd filed a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, alleging that police officers used excessive force in attempting to arrest him. Initially, the district court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants. On appeal to this court, we remanded for further proceedings, finding that a claim of excessive force could state a constitutional deprivation. Kidd v. O'Neil, 774 F.2d 1252 (4th Cir.1985). The district court conducted a trial and the jury found for the defendants. Kidd appeals.

We have reviewed the record before us and the jury instructions. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment entered on the jury's verdict. Because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maynard v. Schmidt
804 F.2d 1250 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33366, 1986 WL 18009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-ray-kidd-v-robert-oneill-mike-lomonaco-fair-ca4-1986.