Dennis Ray Freeman v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 2014
Docket06-13-00131-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Dennis Ray Freeman v. State (Dennis Ray Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis Ray Freeman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00131-CR

DENNIS RAY FREEMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 42132-B

Per Curiam ORDER

Dennis Ray Freeman appeals from his convictions for attempted sexual assault of a child

and indecency with a child. Freeman filed a pretrial motion seeking to suppress oral statements

that he made to police before, during, or after his arrest and a second pretrial motion seeking to

suppress evidence seized in connection with his detention and arrest. The motions were

ultimately denied, with oral findings made on the record by the trial court. No written findings

of fact or conclusions of law were entered by the trial court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 38.22, § 6 (West Supp. 2013).

Freeman and the State have jointly asked that written findings be made and filed in the

record of this case and have represented that the trial court is willing to do so. Based on their

joint request, we abate this appeal and remand it to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4.

The trial court is instructed to enter its findings of facts and conclusions of law related to

Freeman’s pretrial motions to suppress, which shall be filed with this Court in the form of a

supplemental clerk’s record within twenty-one days of the date of this order.

The abatement will terminate and this Court’s jurisdiction will resume on the filing of the

supplemental clerk’s record.

Counsel has also asked for an opportunity to file additional briefing based on the written

findings. That request is granted. Any supplemental briefing shall be filed by the parties within

ten days of the date on which the supplemental clerk’s record is filed with this Court.

2 All appellate timetables are hereby stayed and will resume on our receipt of the

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 10, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dennis Ray Freeman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-ray-freeman-v-state-texapp-2014.