Dennis Ray Freeman v. State
This text of Dennis Ray Freeman v. State (Dennis Ray Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-13-00131-CR
DENNIS RAY FREEMAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 42132-B
Per Curiam ORDER
Dennis Ray Freeman appeals from his convictions for attempted sexual assault of a child
and indecency with a child. Freeman filed a pretrial motion seeking to suppress oral statements
that he made to police before, during, or after his arrest and a second pretrial motion seeking to
suppress evidence seized in connection with his detention and arrest. The motions were
ultimately denied, with oral findings made on the record by the trial court. No written findings
of fact or conclusions of law were entered by the trial court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
art. 38.22, § 6 (West Supp. 2013).
Freeman and the State have jointly asked that written findings be made and filed in the
record of this case and have represented that the trial court is willing to do so. Based on their
joint request, we abate this appeal and remand it to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4.
The trial court is instructed to enter its findings of facts and conclusions of law related to
Freeman’s pretrial motions to suppress, which shall be filed with this Court in the form of a
supplemental clerk’s record within twenty-one days of the date of this order.
The abatement will terminate and this Court’s jurisdiction will resume on the filing of the
supplemental clerk’s record.
Counsel has also asked for an opportunity to file additional briefing based on the written
findings. That request is granted. Any supplemental briefing shall be filed by the parties within
ten days of the date on which the supplemental clerk’s record is filed with this Court.
2 All appellate timetables are hereby stayed and will resume on our receipt of the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: April 10, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dennis Ray Freeman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-ray-freeman-v-state-texapp-2014.