Dennis Jackson v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Order filed February 2, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00158-CR
DENNIS JACKSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1606665
ORDER
Appellant’s appointed counsel, Adam Banks Brown, filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is frivolous, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). On December 27, 2022, we informed counsel that to ensure appellant’s rights pursuant to Anders are protected, counsel had to deliver to appellant his motion to withdraw as counsel either in person or by both certified and first-class mail at appellant’s last known address. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(b). Although counsel’s motion certified the
motion was served on appellant by mail, it did not indicate whether the motion was served on appellant by both certified and first-class mail at appellant’s last known address. Counsel was requested to provide the court with a requisite certificate regarding proper service of the motion by both certified and first-class mail at appellant’s last known address within 10 days.
As of this date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, we order counsel to provide the court with the requested certificate within 10 days of the date of this order. If counsel fails to comply with this order, his brief and motion may be stricken, and the appeal abated for appointment of new counsel.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dennis Jackson v. the State of Texas (Dennis Jackson v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.