Dennis Hutchinson v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. App. 449

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
• Decided: September 25, 2024
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 449 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-23-516

Opinion Delivered September 25, 2024 DENNIS HUTCHINSON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST DIVISION V. [NO. 60CR-08-983]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON, APPELLEE JUDGE DISMISSED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

Dennis Hutchinson, acting pro se, appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition

for postconviction relief from his 2008 jury conviction for second-degree murder. The State

correctly argues that Hutchinson’s petition was untimely filed in the circuit court and that

we lack jurisdiction to address his appeal.

In Hutchinson v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 235, we affirmed Hutchinson’s conviction and

aggregate sentence of 540 months’ imprisonment. The mandate in that case was issued on

March 30, 2010. See Hutchinson v. State, No. CR-09-596, Mandate (Ark. App. Mar. 30, 2010)

(originally docketed as CACR09-596).1 On April 26, 2023, Hutchinson filed a pro se petition

1 Hutchinson filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis in 2016, which our supreme court denied in Hutchinson v. State, 2017 Ark. 55, 510 S.W.3d 245 (per curiam). requesting relief in the circuit court. On May 11, 2023, the circuit court entered an order

denying his petition as untimely and without merit.

If an appeal was taken of the judgment of conviction, a petition claiming relief under

this rule must be filed in the circuit court within sixty days of the date that the appellate

court issues its mandate. Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c)(ii). The time limitations imposed in Rule

37.2(c) are jurisdictional; if they are not met, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant

postconviction relief. Wright v. State, 2011 Ark. 356, at 4; Westbrook v. State, 2022 Ark. App.

180, at 2. Hutchinson filed his petition more than thirteen years after our mandate was

issued—clearly beyond sixty days of the mandate.

Under Rule 37.2, the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider Hutchinson’s

petition for postconviction relief. Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

HARRISON, C.J., and THYER, J., agree.

Dennis Hutchinson, pro se appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: A. Evangeline Bacon, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.