Dennis A. Gagnon v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
This text of 454 F.2d 287 (Dennis A. Gagnon v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order denying habeas corpus relief is affirmed.
Gagnon arranged for an agreed price to obtain through a male friend a girl for intercourse. Unfortunately (for him), Gagnon submitted the proposition to an undercover police officer. For this, he was charged with a violation of O.R.S. § 167.120, and convicted, the girl having been obtained.
The most important contention is that the statute is overbroad and vague and, therefore, unconstitutional. But there is no showing that the overbreadth or vagueness, if any, was applied to Gagnon. Camacho v. United States, 9th Cir., 407 F.2d 39, is apposite.
Other points are without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 F.2d 287, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-a-gagnon-v-hoyt-c-cupp-superintendent-oregon-state-penitentiary-ca9-1972.