Denning v. Corwin

4 Wend. 208
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

This is a case in which notice should have been given to the defendants, so that they might have been heard. The plaintiff claims only an undivided third of the lot; the defendants therefore may be tenants in common with him, and if so, have the right, until a partition, to the enjoyment of the property. They are not trespassers, and cannot be treated as such by the court. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denning v. Corwin, 4 Wend. 208 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

4 Wend. 208 (Denning v. Corwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West v. Walker
3 N.J. Eq. 279 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1835)