Dennie v. Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Dennie v. Ohio Edison Co.

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 134

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 22, 1964·No. No. 38462·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If, as the parties apparently concede, the order of the Common Pleas Court was a final appealable order, it is apparent that our decision in Shilling v. Octavio (this day decided), 176 Ohio St., 123, requires affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Younger, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Younger, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

If, as the parties apparently concede, the order of the Common Pleas Court was a final appealable order, it is apparent that our decision in Shilling v. Octavio (this day decided), 176 Ohio St., 123, requires affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Younger, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Younger, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Dennie v. Ohio Edison Co., 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 134 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 134 (Dennie v. Ohio Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.