Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A.
This text of Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A. (Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:24-cv-454-MOC KIMBERLY DENNIE, individually, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant. (Doc. No. 8). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on July 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 14). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the Original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), is DENIED as moot. Signed: November 18, 2024
asievrnna Max O. Cogburn Jr , United States District Judge Toalg ht
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennie-v-bank-of-america-na-ncwd-2024.