Dennie Lee Rankins v. Joyce McLaughlin Jimmy Owens, Doctor Penny Buckanon

Fourth Circuit

Dennie Lee Rankins v. Joyce McLaughlin Jimmy Owens, Doctor Penny Buckanon

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40404, 1995 WL 761089

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 1995

Docket95-7571

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Dennie Lee Rankins v. Joyce McLaughlin Jimmy Owens, Doctor Penny Buckanon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dennie Lee Rankins v. Joyce McLaughlin Jimmy Owens, Doctor Penny Buckanon, 73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40404, 1995 WL 761089 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dennie Lee RANKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Joyce McLAUGHLIN; Jimmy Owens, Doctor; Penny Buckanon,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7571.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.

Dennie Lee Rankins, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NEIMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rankins v. McLaughlin, No. CA-94-745-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dennie Lee RANKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Joyce McLAUGHLIN; Jimmy Owens, Doctor; Penny Buckanon,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7571.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.

Dennie Lee Rankins, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NEIMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rankins v. McLaughlin, No. CA-94-745-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40404, 1995 WL 761089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennie-lee-rankins-v-joyce-mclaughlin-jimmy-owens--ca4-1995.