Denney v. Malone
This text of 261 A.D. 1050 (Denney v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment in favor of Buffalo Sewer Authority affirmed, with costs. Judgment in favor of Mary C. Malone, as administratrix, etc., and New Amsterdam Casualty Company, reversed on the law and motion as to said defendants denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that it may be found that plaintiff is a third party beneficiary under the contract. All concur. (The judgments dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action by a third party under a construction contract.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 1050, 27 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denney-v-malone-nyappdiv-1941.