Dennehy v. Copperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dennehy v. Copperman

134 A.D.3d 543, 20 N.Y.S.3d 885

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2015·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered January 14, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motions to strike the request for punitive damages and to dismiss the causes of action for medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, breach of contract, and negligence, modified, on the law, to grant the motions to the extent of dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract and negligence, for the reasons set forth in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc, of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]), and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Concur — Friedman, J.R, Saxe, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Manzanet-Daniels, J., concurs in part and dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in my opinion in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc. of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered January 14, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motions to strike the request for punitive damages and to dismiss the causes of action for medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, breach of contract, and negligence, modified, on the law, to grant the motions to the extent of dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract and negligence, for the reasons set forth in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc, of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]), and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Concur — Friedman, J.R, Saxe, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Manzanet-Daniels, J., concurs in part and dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in my opinion in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc. of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]).

Dennehy v. Copperman, 134 A.D.3d 543, 20 N.Y.S.3d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

134 A.D.3d 543 (Dennehy v. Copperman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related