Dennehy v. Copperman
This text of 134 A.D.3d 543 (Dennehy v. Copperman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered January 14, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motions to strike the request for punitive damages and to dismiss the causes of action for medical malpractice, lack of informed consent, breach of contract, and negligence, modified, on the law, to grant the motions to the extent of dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract and negligence, for the reasons set forth in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc, of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]), and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Concur — Friedman, J.R, Saxe, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Manzanet-Daniels, J., concurs in part and dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons set forth in my opinion in B.F. v Reproductive Medicine Assoc. of New York, LLP (136 AD3d 73 [1st Dept 2015] [decided simultaneously herewith]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.3d 543, 20 N.Y.S.3d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennehy-v-copperman-nyappdiv-2015.